http://nerdsmakesciencefun.com/?p=235
http://nerdsmakesciencefun.com/?p=259
Cripes, I don’t remember the last time I updated this site.
A couple things before I begin.
First, that robotics club takeover isn’t going to happen. It turns out they need a specific format, and wordpress just doesn’t fit the bill. They’ll probably have the school pay for a server and domain.
Also, I’ve essentially given up on categorizing. I might get around to sifting through the almost 100 posts, and even clearing out some, but for now, it stays uncategorized. If you read this and need an article, post here and I can get you a link.
And for the main event, I’m continuing the Kent Hovind challenge rebuttal.
The two links at the top of the page, reproduced slightly below, are how far I’ve gotten so far with this challenge of sorts. I’m still not much of a biology student, and I’m still whipping these off the top of my head, and wikipedia if need be. Again, follow along here.
http://nerdsmakesciencefun.com/?p=235
http://nerdsmakesciencefun.com/?p=259
23) The problem with this question is that “major” is ill-defined. You can basically pass anything off as (relatively) minor if it was essential to your argument. Since I’m still crazy rusty, I’ll just say that evolutionary theory has predicted correctly and multiple times the location, appearance, and age of “missing links.” I’m not sure on specifcs, but I’d assume it includes some of the fossils along the path to the horse.
24) Wrong answer: point out that creationism isn’t scientific. This is what they want, so that both creationism and evolution are classified as religion and thus can’t be taught. Instead, answer a straw man with a straw man. Note: I’m Christian, and I don’t believe what I’m about to write.
What’s so holy about a God who kills his followers at the drop of a hat, and implicates all of humanity for a transgression that happened when there were only two people on the earth, despite later commands that no man be punished for the crimes of his father?
25) No. This isn’t evolution either way, but I believe that God created the universe (and God said, “Let there be a big fricking bang.”) and that evolution took place to create life in its present form.
26) Reasonable, yes. Right, most likely not, since I’m bs’ing this. They are provable; all you really need is to dig up a bunch more fossils or ask someone who actually knows what he’s talking about. I’ve indulged in some religion in questions about metaphysics, but not in any questions about evolution. I based my answers off educated guesses from my limited knowledge of biology. They reflect science.
27) Educated guesses require less faith than relying on a Bronze Age text. In addition, the person who says God designed everything must also believe that paternity tests and any other number of modern developments are null and void.
28) What the heck are you talking about? 1: I believe God created the world. 2: God can still be demonstrated by process of elimination.
29) Yes. There are so many facts and modern conveniences based off it that anything else would be lunacy. For more information, go on youtube and look for “Why young earth creationists must deny gravity.”
30) Success, prestige, care for the less fortunate because you understand that misfortune is caused by random chance rather than “God’s judgment.” Your eternal destiny is being buried under about 4 feet of dirt.
31) There are bound to be people who follow the given reasons. But for many people, including myself, they follow evolution because they have analyzed it and it is the most reasonable possibility. In fact, a good number of people at my (Christian) school do not argue for evolution because our Bible grade depends on that.
This is still incomplete, and I’ve worked on this for a day and a bit, but I figure I might as well post this, because I can always get the rest of the questions done later.